Three leading AI models collaborate through structured debate to deliver more accurate, unbiased, and explainable decisions for your most critical workflows.

ChatGPT

Claude

Gemini
From ontology definition to tamper-proof certificate generation with full data extraction
Define the schema and data fields required for your document type. Specify what data needs to be extracted and validated from each document category.
Schema structure
Business logic
Type constraints
Submit documents matching your ontology along with record identifiers. Nexus accepts multiple input formats for seamless integration with your existing systems.
API / JSON
RESTful API integration
CSV / XLS
Batch file upload
Direct Upload
Web interface
Three AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini) extract data, validate documents, detect fraud, and converge toward consensus through structured debate.
Receive the extracted and validated data in your original format (API/JSON or CSV/XLS), plus a tamper-proof verification certificate with QR code.
Scan the QR code on any certificate to instantly verify authenticity and access the original document

Certificate with QR code for instant verification



Step 1: Integrity Check
Certificate is verified for tampering and authenticity
Step 2: View Details
See certificate info, issuer, validity status, and attached files
Step 3: Access Original
Click the URL to view the original verified document
From document submission to verified decision in under 2 seconds
Submit documents through our secure API or web interface. Nexus immediately extracts metadata, normalizes formats, and prepares the document for multi-model analysis.
Three AI models analyze the document simultaneously and independently. Each model brings unique strengths: ChatGPT for reasoning, Claude for nuance, and Gemini for context.
When models disagree, they engage in a structured debate protocol. Each model presents evidence, challenges others' reasoning, and refines its position through multiple rounds until reaching consensus or identifying areas requiring human review.
Round 1: Initial Positions
Each model presents its analysis and confidence level
Round 2: Challenge & Evidence
Models challenge disagreements with specific evidence
Round 3: Refinement
Models refine positions based on peer feedback
The system reaches one of three outcomes: strong consensus (all models agree), qualified consensus (majority agreement with documented dissent), or escalation to human review (irreconcilable differences).
All three models agree with high confidence
Majority agreement with documented dissent
Escalated to human expert when needed
Our multi-model approach delivers measurable improvements across key metrics
Built on cutting-edge AI orchestration and distributed systems architecture
Try our interactive demo to experience multi-model AI consensus firsthand.